Today's hottest deals

Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-KF1BR
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 120
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 186
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9.9
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 31 29 75 102 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 130
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 65.7
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KS2666D4N12008G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback