Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 23:45
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 381
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 60.4
54% 63.8 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 59.4
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 374 349 148 149 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 425
Write 432
Mixed 375
SusWrite 242
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 34.4
139% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 302
222% 288 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Kingston HP24D4U7S8MH-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 24.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX Builds (Compare 1,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback