Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 64
2-Core 119
50% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 727
60% 519 Pts
64-Core 1,202
74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 128
Parallax 128
116% 133 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 94.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B- 480GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 79 116 37 9.2 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 129
Write 344
Mixed 282
SusWrite 91.4
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 12.6
47% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 17.8
35% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
132GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 97.2
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
63GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 81
Write 87.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 62.4
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 4R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 50% 38 258 183 144 27" 1920 1080 MSI3CB5 MSI G271
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback