Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 18:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 490
66% 490 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.3% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 75.4
44% 63.6 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 43.8
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2362 2386 2424 2506 2506 2482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,474
Write 2,506
Mixed 2223
SusWrite 2,444
544% 2,412 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 85.4
275% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 1,000
756% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 380%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 31.6
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 28.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback