Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191231
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 03:49
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 656
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 0.3
84% 62.6 fps
MRender 82.4
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 66.2
60% 74.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-480 480GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.10.60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 26 85 24 28 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 319
Write 143
Mixed 205
SusWrite 39.6
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 22.6
89% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 49.4
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 38
32% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
338GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 143 142 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 143
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 30
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback