Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G464

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G464  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 00:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,111
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 2,158
134% 2,158 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 175
Parallax 168
156% 178 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 818 713 534 478 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,530
Write 1,756
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 735
303% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 77.8
265% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,351
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,112
848% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 241%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 38.2
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 36.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G464 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G464

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback