Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T5 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V20.3
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 67.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 318
90% 175 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,121
104% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,356
84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1146) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 104
Parallax 11.6
6% 40.8 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1691 1691 505 469 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,346
Write 1,780
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 1,078
374% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 72.2
237% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 1,103
777% 968 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 274%
Great: 332%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Read 3.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 2.5
4% 2.72 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 14
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V20.3 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback