Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory41 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 19:15
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 66.9
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 163
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 645
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 31.1
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 29
Splatting 25.3
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
223GB free
Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,202
Write 776
Mixed 664
194% 880 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 16.3
99% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 21.1
59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 132%
Great: 159%
OCZ Vector 180 240GB-$160
223GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.6% Good
Read 265
Write 255
Mixed 260
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 26.8
100% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 83.4
94% 159 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 108%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 262
Write 214
Mixed 201
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 18.2
88% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 64.7
77% 134 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$64
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 153
Mixed 140
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.26
115% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
149GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 71.4
Write 69.7
Mixed 65.6
52% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.32
93% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback