Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC9i7QNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC9i7QNX
MotherboardIntel NUC9i7QNB  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 23:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 784
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 115
Parallax 125
105% 123 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 102
Splatting 86.8
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1966 786 785 782 786 805 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 1,886
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 985
285% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 72.1
233% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 1,028
780% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 223%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C16FR 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC9i7QNB Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC9i7QNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback