Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 01:15
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 460
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
111% 126 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.8
89% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 158 89 74 81 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 192
Write 112
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 137
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 11.6
53% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 15.4
12% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 100%
Adata EC700G 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 334 250 251 248 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 209
Write 370
Mixed 174
SusWrite 270
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 30
104% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 200
136% 167 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 108
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 127
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CB DDR4 3000 2OZ 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CB DDR4 3000 2OZ 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 32.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 28.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback