Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C50-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C50-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 16:15
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 47.8
1-Core 28
2-Core 42.8
27% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 55.2
8-Core 55.7
7% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 80.1
5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 35 67 64 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 52.1
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 61.4
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C50-A Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback