Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V13.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.2  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180503
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 247
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 694
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1042) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 7.4
5% 14.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 134 96 100 136 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 349
Write 127
Mixed 141
SusWrite 119
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 27.1
92% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 133
134% 216 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
673GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 136 149 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 141
Write 152
Mixed 66
SusWrite 144
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.2 Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback