Today's hottest deals

HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 48.5
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 59
30% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 84.7
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 88
5% 88 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSSBN032GA27MC1 32GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFH01H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 25 25 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback