Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 549
63% 493 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 102
Parallax 104
88% 105 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 88.5
83% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 120
Mixed 58.9
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 10.4
36% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 22.6
14% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
259GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 92 91 90 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 139
Write 133
Mixed 100
SusWrite 88.4
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Portable 2TB
715GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 133 133 130 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Read 109
Write 133
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 129
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
146% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 17.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback