Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 18:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 124
55% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 376
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 84.5
52% 69.7 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 44.9
48% 60.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 334 235 164 167 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 435
Write 417
Mixed 366
SusWrite 235
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 25.9
42% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 174
150% 223 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 101%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 236 234 238 238 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 235
Write 230
Mixed 126
SusWrite 235
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 1.8
4% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback