Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$85 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 113 56% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 408 39% 321 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84D6) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.52% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 8.3 6% 6.9 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.52% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF87 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 120 125 127 117 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 392 Write 288 Mixed 147 SusWrite 146 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 12 44% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 32.3 41% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 56%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2TB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 141 142 142 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 124 Write 138 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 141 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 89%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 122 122 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 123 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 120 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.7 5.6 6.2 5.5 6.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 25.4 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.8 7% 8.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB 1,822 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 18.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 14.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	42x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	32x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350