Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16U4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 46% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL65 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16U4  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime15 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 00:46
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 70.4
34% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 232
23% 187 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12A1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3091
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 52.7
49% 67 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 49.8
40% 48 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADXA0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 658
Write 183
Mixed 326
85% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 14.5
86% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 167
136% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16U4 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16U4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $286WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback