Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81UV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 36.5
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 127
42% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 213
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.46
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 80 80 87 90 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 537
Write 131
Mixed 169
SusWrite 88.9
50% 232 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 17.9
95% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 186
141% 193 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 169%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
160GB free
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 141 21 203 229 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 364
Write 259
Mixed 305
SusWrite 161
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 8.1
42% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 30
35% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81UV Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback