Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171117
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 66.2
36% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 64.1
8-Core 60.8
8% 62.4 Pts
64-Core 59.7
4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.3
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 18 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback