Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 15:17
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$113
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 657
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 89
76% 92.7 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 76.9
75% 93.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 314 293 277 258 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1285
Write 518
Mixed 995
SusWrite 286
171% 771 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 64.3
223% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 273
291% 482 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 164%
Great: 163%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
361GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 455 473 485 485 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 455
Mixed 392
SusWrite 446
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 62.6
213% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Pm991 NVMe Samsung 256GB
88GB free
Firmware: 25307039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 362 176 162 174 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,053
Mixed 935
SusWrite 267
192% 857 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 70.4
239% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 555
443% 607 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 166%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 M378A5244CB0-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 24GB
2533, 2533, 2533, 2533 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 28.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback