Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q3 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 50
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 43.4
31% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 63.8
8-Core 77.8
9% 70.8 Pts
64-Core 65.9
4% 65.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 1.6
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA6EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 11 2.3 17 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 19.9
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 11
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q3 DELUXE Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback