Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook 14  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141209
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 46.8
47% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 161
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Firepro M4100
HP(103C 2100) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.14534.1003
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 6
5% 6.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 62 56 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 276
Write 76.2
Mixed 112
SusWrite 53.9
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 16.2
70% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 91.8
70% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 121%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1405
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 76.2
71% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 93%
Mass Storage Device 128GB
5GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 40 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 38.2
Write 34.6
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 33.7
50% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 6.4
558% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 14.2
1,102% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 7.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 14 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback