Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20EFCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20EFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EFCTO1WW
Memory4.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 41.3
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 91.2
33% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 332
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2591
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 11
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000 512GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 161 126 123 78 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 232
Write 140
Mixed 154
SusWrite 129
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 17.2
50% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 220
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 11.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback