Today's hottest deals

Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 172
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 215
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670
AMD(1002 7600) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5.7
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen01sm21ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 27 29 29 27 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.5% Average
Read 254
Write 237
Mixed 228
SusWrite 40.8
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 24.8
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 47.1
69% 127 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
400GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 68
SusWrite 103
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905403-559A00LF 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback