Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$93
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 146
55% 95 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 209
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 145
Parallax 102
89% 119 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 102
Splatting 95.2
86% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 265 278 288 284 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 333
Write 311
Mixed 235
SusWrite 261
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 25.4
90% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 231
192% 277 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$75
359GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 135 134 132 131 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 128
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback