Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 121
53% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 120
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
XFX(1682 2961) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 17.6
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 11.2
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 158 17 85 80 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 246
Write 226
Mixed 209
SusWrite 81.7
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 14.8
70% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 30.4
DQ Mixed 17.3
16% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37%
Great: 156%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
160GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 95
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 83.6
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback