Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-7049A-T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 21 months ago.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7049A-T  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DAi-N
Memory176.3 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200226
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 733
66% 557 Pts
64-Core 2,855
177% 2,855 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 9.3
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago SMC3108 960GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 310 310 314 301 296 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.4% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 330
Mixed 341
SusWrite 312
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 36.7
128% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 288
214% 284 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 93%
Avago SMC3108 20TB
440GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 23 63 164 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
Read 340
Write 14.8
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 76.2
27% 127 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.1
47% 10.9 MB/s
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
814GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2312 2198 2202 2203 2191 2236 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 1,880
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 2,224
420% 1,864 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 58.2
207% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 844
626% 834 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 318%
Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
481GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2090 2102 2061 2105 2104 2152 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,056
Write 1,951
Mixed 1,352
SusWrite 2,102
420% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 66.6
231% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 853
628% 833 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 319%
Great: 425%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE604 12TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: LEGNW925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 245 245 245 236 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 219
Mixed 112
SusWrite 241
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 2.2
400% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
WIBU - CodeMeter-StickM 8GB
7GB free, PID 03f3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 28.7
Write 17.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 17.9
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.6
317% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6E1 12x16GB
12 of 16 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 48.5
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 120%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7049A-T Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro SYS-7049A-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback