Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook S13 X330FN_S330FN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook S13 X330FN_S330FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X330FN
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 06:57
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 95
56% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 92.4
8-Core 95.7
12% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 97.2
6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1D1E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 5.4
4% 3.93 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 193 266 187 194 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 731
Write 692
Mixed 624
SusWrite 212
126% 565 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 64.1
224% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 548
417% 572 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 138%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 18.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S13 X330FN_S330FN Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S13 X330FN_S330FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback