Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3910
Memory1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 20:11
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 137
55% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 194
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 31.3
18% 29.5 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 24.4
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB 3.1 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 22 22 25 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.5% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 22.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 22.9
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 4.4
859% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-020.A00LF 04CB AD63I1B1624EU 04CB AD63I1B1624EU 0198 99U5474-026.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback