Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 225
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 611
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 133
Parallax 174
74% 133 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 93
Splatting 131
110% 135 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 147 84 47 90 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 480
Write 333
Mixed 336
SusWrite 108
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 14.6
83% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 183
159% 234 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 93%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
136GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 460 399 471 471 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 206
Mixed 396
SusWrite 456
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 40.9
148% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 198
177% 262 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback