Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W65_67SH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SH
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 123
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 236
26% 204 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Clevo(1558 6565) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 432 423 431 378 395 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 422
Mixed 225
SusWrite 416
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 35
140% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 160
171% 285 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
ADATA HV611 1TB
269GB free, PID a36a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 98.6
Write 102
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 104
114% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-SD3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 16.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SH Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback