Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 15:13
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 715
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q4
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 132
Parallax 180
87% 140 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 116
Splatting 86.6
80% 98.9 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 101%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 117
Parallax 8.7
5% 43.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.7
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 1747 1758 1724 1836 1836 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,385
Write 1,860
Mixed 1,524
SusWrite 1742
369% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 67.9
220% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 931
711% 976 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 275%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
688GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1990 1993 1990 1472 1387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,630
SusWrite 1757
425% 1,889 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 76.8
248% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1247
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 936
712% 973 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 316%
Great: 435%
SSK 512GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.9% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 36.6
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 39.7
9% 38 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 12.8
43% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 26.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 27
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback