Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 16:44
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 232
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 738
70% 580 Pts
64-Core 969
60% 969 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 110
Parallax 115
100% 116 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 85.7
82% 103 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 150 134 200 114 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 488
Mixed 381
SusWrite 174
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 53.1
182% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 231
211% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
50GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,522
Write 2,335
Mixed 1,699
486% 2,185 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 83.3
273% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 1,023
771% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 47 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 67.1
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 45.8
46% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 57%
StoreJet 2TB
160GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 85 82 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 24.4
Write 58.1
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 82.6
35% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 69%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
83GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 30 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 31.8
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 31.6
42% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback