Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 90.2
45% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 222
20% 168 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1495 MHz, MLim: 1745 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.5% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 48.8
Parallax 43.3
48% 50.5 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 33.6
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
259GB free
Firmware: CC31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 106 114 114 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 115
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
722GB free
Firmware: MX4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 138 147 144 148 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 152
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 146
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXM F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback