Today's hottest deals

PC Tornado R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPC Tornado R5  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 17:38
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 250
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 797
73% 613 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 93.7
Parallax 84.4
73% 89.2 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 74.3
71% 89 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1202A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 211 122 108 226 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1797
Write 1,036
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 221
228% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 29.9
169% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 564
496% 746 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 172%
Great: 282%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
860GB free
Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 319 274 282 286 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 216
Write 306
Mixed 142
SusWrite 284
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 3.3
58% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 293
232% 321 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 328%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
148GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.2
Write 0.2
SusWrite 1.4
0% 0.6 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
467GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 17 11 7.3 7.8 8.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 19.3
5% 6.97 MB/s
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 28.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 24
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tornado R5 Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: PC Tornado R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback