Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 14:50
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 773
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 63
Parallax 86.5
0% 49.9 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 7.3 159 113 77 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 455
Write 170
Mixed 353
SusWrite 79.6
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 38.3
143% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 158
154% 242 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
365GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 198 222 238 229 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 452
Write 399
Mixed 214
SusWrite 235
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 16.1
77% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 83.5
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 31.3
40% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2133C15-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback