Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook W65_67SF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SF
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 192
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 492
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6502) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 6.5
3% 7 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 63 62 107 88 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78.4
Write 93.7
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 77.8
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
366% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-193.A00LF 9905428-422.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SF Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback