Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17E4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GL75 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-17E4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 231
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 668
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1298) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1296
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 54.4
50% 60.9 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 51.2
40% 49.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 740 739 746 746 745 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1020
Write 917
Mixed 880
SusWrite 768
202% 896 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 67.4
231% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 1,076
786% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 204%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 23.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E4 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback