Today's hottest deals

HP s5550la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP s5550la  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A99
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100428
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '17 at 20:57
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 88.8
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 79.1
48% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 96.5
8-Core 98.2
13% 97.3 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
MSI(1462 1613) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.892.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 83.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 84.9
60% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
414GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 19.1
Mixed 12.8
21% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.17
58% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 44%
Maxtor Basics Portable 320GB
82GB free, PID 7450
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 19.4
Mixed 9.9
20% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.26
43% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback