Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemX79
MotherboardIntel X79v2.72 KD
Memory11.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 162
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 619
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 470
Asus(1043 0533) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 80.8
44% 76.9 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 45.5
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 259 114 45 122 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 452
Write 321
Mixed 344
SusWrite 147
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 30.5
117% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 187
169% 255 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
278GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 132 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 79.5
Write 82.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 134
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback