Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EQ45M-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EQ45M-S2  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 87.8
44% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 88.9
12% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus EAH5450
Asus(1043 301B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 169 5 70 12 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.6% Poor
Read 256
Write 233
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 83.1
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 92%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
2GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 256
Write 244
Mixed 234
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 185
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
164GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 87.4
Write 88.1
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 74.4
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EQ45M-S2 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EQ45M-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback