Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 11:12
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$100
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 905
93% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.4
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geonix 240GB 240GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 421 424 414 288 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 411
Mixed 333
SusWrite 360
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 33.9
142% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 166
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%
GXCVDB013376 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 87 86 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
Read 84.7
Write 81.4
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 86.4
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback