Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 23:46
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 230
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 690
67% 551 Pts
64-Core 679
42% 679 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Asus(1043 05AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 0.2
48% 39.4 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 44.3
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 83 3.9 7.5 59 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 297
Write 115
Mixed 329
SusWrite 103
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 38.1
147% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 184
157% 229 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 87 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 94.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 88.6
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback