Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus 1025C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus 1025C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1025C
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120313
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '22 at 18:57
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2800 451 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 39.9 1-Core 6.1 2-Core 10.1 16% 18.7 Pts	4-Core 18.5 8-Core 21.7 3% 20.1 Pts	64-Core 20.7 1% 20.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 84A9) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1096 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 21 34 41 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 27.2 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 47%
SDHC Card 32GB 1,576 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 25GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 12 12 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 12.6 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 12.1 18% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.8 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 22%
JMicron Tech 250GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 17 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 21 Write 19.5 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 16.7 24% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF1339J.C 1x4GB 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 2.9 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1025C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Asus 1025C

CPU
Atom N2800IntelBench 26%, 451 samples	1x

GPU
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,010 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BF1339J.C 1x4GBCrucialBench 11%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Asus 1025C

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus 1025C

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)