Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 04:06
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 205
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 755
73% 603 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.3% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 126
Parallax 83.5
74% 100 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 72
69% 86.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1030 250GB SSD
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1241 278 181 183 185 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 1,230
Mixed 1,000
SusWrite 376
202% 897 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.5
212% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 564
402% 509 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 150%
Great: 226%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
188GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 37 33 39 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 40.9
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 37.7
9% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 10.4
35% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 21.9
16% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 86%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
115GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 115 115 117 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 115
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 39.1
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback