Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 01:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 47
25% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 85.9
8-Core 147
14% 116 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 38.6
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 26.9
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Asgard AN3 1TNVM 1TB
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A2S8MA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 779 996 1238 1197 1114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,699
Write 1,281
Mixed 161
SusWrite 999
230% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 35.9
118% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 169
123% 161 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 173%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback