Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive5.74% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 04:10
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 526
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
PNY(196E 1213) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 122
Parallax 107
87% 112 fps
MRender 87.2
Gravity 116
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 480GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 26 18 15 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.74% Terrible
Read 40.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 20
6% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 4.1
8% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
187GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 104 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 158
Write 141
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 106
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 160 171 175 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 134
Mixed 74
SusWrite 170
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 96%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 19.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback