Today's hottest deals

Asus G20BM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G20BM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20BM
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 53
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 108
44% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 180
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.4
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 298 284 279 288 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 300
Write 276
Mixed 228
SusWrite 285
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 26.8
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 212
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 110%
Corsair UFD 8GB
3GB free, PID 0a60
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.9 7.9 7.7 8.1 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.7
10% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20BM Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20BM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback