Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G9-792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G9-792  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger_SLS
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151228
Uptime13 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 08:58
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 71
2-Core 180
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 507
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 107D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 6.3
5% 24.4 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 10
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G891201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 245 214 254 246 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 380
Write 205
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 255
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 17.3
57% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 140
140% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 106%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
6GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 94 87 91 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 97.9
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 90
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
155GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 71.9
Write 73.1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 61.5
85% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 19.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 6R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 40% 50 260 177 60 17.2" 1536 864 AUO109B
Typical Predator G9-792 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback