Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 895
84% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 164
Parallax 168
145% 170 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 147
Splatting 128
129% 163 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 132%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,591
Write 2,219
Mixed 1539
470% 2,116 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 74.4
243% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 407
382% 611 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Amd-raid Array 3 199GB
101GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 35 34 32 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 33.8
Write 51.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 32.3
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3
115% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 24%
Amd-raid Array 1 500GB
35GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 36 30 30 34 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 73.2
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 33.5
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid Array 2 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 38 39 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 111
SusWrite 40
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.3
309% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 49.4
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 45.3
100% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback